Skip to content
A Autometric

[frameworks]

SOC 2 enforcement inside the pull request.

Autometric applies SOC 2 control context in the same review stream that already catches security bugs, logic defects, performance regressions, and review noise before it hits developers.

Book a SOC 2 demo See Framework Enforcement

[framework evidence]

Review depth stays on. Framework evidence layers in.

control-mapped findings

SOC 2

CC6, CC7, CC8 review pack active

evidence export

PCI DSS 4.0

Requirement 6 mapped to repository rules

evidence export

FedRAMP

AU, CM, SI controls attached to findings

evidence export

Why teams scope it

Use SOC 2 on engineering systems where change management and review evidence matter to customer trust or audit readiness.

What gets attached

Findings can carry control references, review context, and exportable evidence instead of generic comment threads.

What stays on

The same core reviewer still looks for bugs, security issues, and performance regressions outside the framework lens.

[how enforcement shows up]

SOC 2 changes the review context, not the reviewer.

  • Attach trust-services control references to in-scope findings.
  • Raise review strictness on repositories explicitly marked in scope.
  • Export evidence bundles that auditors and security teams can reuse.

[best-in-class review]

Core AI code review still stays on.

SOC 2 does not replace core review quality. Autometric still reviews for bugs, unsafe auth flows, brittle error handling, performance regressions, and noisy style drift while the control pack adds governance context.

When a pull request links a bug or feature ticket, that task context can stay attached to the same review and evidence path.

[evidence]

Evidence teams can actually reuse.

  • Named control references in the finding itself.
  • Immutable review history for who approved what and when.
  • Portable evidence output for downstream workpapers or ticketing systems.

[rollout]

Typical rollout pattern.

  1. step 1

    Start with one in-scope repository where change control matters most.

  2. step 2

    Tune severity thresholds and merge gates with the security or compliance owner.

  3. step 3

    Expand to adjacent services once the evidence model is trusted.

[cta]

Need to see SOC 2 enforcement on a real repository?

Book a framework demo See the review engine