Skip to content
A Autometric

[frameworks]

PCI DSS review that starts in the pull request, not the audit scramble.

Autometric brings PCI control context to the same review system already looking for security flaws, logic mistakes, and unsafe data handling in payment-adjacent repositories.

Book a PCI demo Visit pricing

[framework evidence]

Review depth stays on. Framework evidence layers in.

control-mapped findings

SOC 2

CC6, CC7, CC8 review pack active

evidence export

PCI DSS 4.0

Requirement 6 mapped to repository rules

evidence export

FedRAMP

AU, CM, SI controls attached to findings

evidence export

Why teams scope it

Payment code paths often need proof that risky changes were reviewed against named requirements.

What gets attached

Control references sit beside the finding, so developers understand both the bug and the compliance consequence.

What stays on

The review engine still catches logic bugs and security defects even when no PCI-specific rule is triggered.

[how enforcement shows up]

PCI DSS 4.0 changes the review context, not the reviewer.

  • Map risky code and logging changes to PCI-relevant controls.
  • Fail closed on in-scope repos when high-confidence violations appear.
  • Keep evidence export tied to the review outcome rather than a separate spreadsheet.

[best-in-class review]

Core AI code review still stays on.

PCI packs add domain context, but the broader review engine still watches for auth flaws, nil-path bugs, retry logic mistakes, and performance regressions that affect payment reliability.

When a pull request links a bug or feature ticket, that task context can stay attached to the same review and evidence path.

[evidence]

Evidence teams can actually reuse.

  • Control-mapped findings with repository scope context.
  • Review artifacts exportable for downstream compliance workflows.
  • One evidence path across GitHub, GitLab, Gerrit, Bitbucket, and Perforce estates.

[rollout]

Typical rollout pattern.

  1. step 1

    Begin with repositories that handle cardholder data or adjacent payment services.

  2. step 2

    Mark in-scope repos and set fail-closed behavior with engineering and compliance owners.

  3. step 3

    Roll forward into the wider payment estate once the false-positive rate is understood.

[cta]

Need to see PCI DSS 4.0 enforcement on a real repository?

Book a framework demo See the review engine